![]() ![]() “Gender,” “sex,” “intersex,” “transgender,” and other terminology have often been misapplied when discussing the controversy. Throughout that time, the media has been following Semenya’s story closely and shaping a narrative that is often misguided or inaccurate. Ever since she became the 800-meter world champion in 2009, the IAAF has gone through several iterations of their regulations for women athletes, and Caster Semenya has been on the receiving end of each successive policy. In fact, the court case is just the latest chapter in the Olympic champion’s decade-long battle with athletic authorities. More recently, the ruling was temporarily suspended, and the issue is far from being resolved. South African runner Caster Semenya competing in Doha, Qatar, in 2019. By a margin of 2-1, an arbitration panel of three made a decision in favor of IAAF regulations, which they described as “discriminatory” but “necessary” for “protecting the integrity of female athletics.” Many have called the ruling flawed. This spring, the Court of Arbitration for Sport upheld rules imposed by the International Association of Athletic Federations (IAAF) limiting the ability of certain athletes with high levels of testosterone to compete as women. Athletic officials have been debating whether an elevated level of testosterone should disqualify her from competing as a woman and they recently decided that, yes, it should. ![]() But for Semenya, whose body produces a naturally high level of testosterone, the response has been different. ![]() The recent controversy surrounding South African runner Caster Semenya has raised a question in the world of sports: What kinds of naturally occurring advantages should be regulated and why?įor swimmer Michael Phelps, the advantages of having a wide wingspan, long torso, and producing low amounts of lactic acid are celebrated. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |